Trial By DNA
by Dr. Hsien-Hsien Lei
Posted April 26, 2007 in DNA and the Law
Jerry Miller has become the 200th person to be exonerated in the United States using DNA evidence. He served 24 undeserved years in prison.
Imagine 50 years into the future when DNA testing is so simple, reliable, and commonplace that detectives at a crime scene have handheld PCR and data analysis machines. Collect a sample and analyze it on the spot. Plug the data into a wi-fi enabled PDA, run the database comparison, find the criminal or at least eliminate the suspects.
Trials would be simple and quick. Prosecutors, judges, and juries could focus on understanding the criminal’s motive and fair sentencing. Only DNA evidence would be needed to prove that someone committed the crime.
What do you think? What’s the future of criminal investigation using DNA?Could it really be so simple?
Not quite. According to Barry Scheck of the Innocence Project, only 10 percent of felonies come with DNA samples available for testing. Of the 200 people who have been exonerated, 123 involved rape cases for which DNA evidence is more readily available.
And there are other problems with relying too much on DNA. Without faster methods of analyzing samples (at this point in time), the backlog of DNA grows and delays prosecutions. While waiting for trial, suspects are free to commit even more crimes. And, of course, DNA-based trials are still subject to the same problems as all others. Planted evidence, lab errors, and procedural mistakes can ensure that someone who’s guilty gets to go free. Or even worse, someone who’s innocent gets locked up for a quarter of a century.
Baltimore Sun, April 26, 2007
Tags: dna evidence, dna, crime, criminals, genetics, genes, trials, guilty, innocent, barry scheck, innocence project, jerry miller
Related Posts:
Eye on DNA, Literally...
The Genographic Project’s Dr. Spencer Wells on Colbert Report...
Eye on DNA Headlines for 3 December 2007...
Please note that comments left using the form below will be publicly displayed. If you'd like to correspond with me privately, please email me at hsien@eyeondna.com.
If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it's probably in moderation. I will approve it as soon as I can! Thanks for your patience.
5 Comments »
Note: Posting will be sporadic while I'm on maternity leave.
Search Eye on DNA
- Consumer Genetics Show 2009 in Boston
- Rule of Thumb on Speeches About Science
- Analysts Say deCODE Genetics Headed for Bankruptcy Court
- Genetically Engineered HTC Touch Diamond Phone
- Putting Your DNA To Use In Bad Economic Times
- Singapore Company DNA Dynasty Will (Not) Tell Your Children’s Future
- Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD): A Discussion
- Family History of Disease Scares Parents More Than Genetic Test Results
- How Many Ways Can A Physician Be Sued (Over Genetic Tests)?
- Server Issues
MOST POPULAR
- DNA Toys: Ben 10 and Digimon Digivice
- 100 Facts About DNA
- Salaries for Jobs in Genetics
- Want a job? Submit your DNA
- What does DNA mean to you? #14
- What does DNA mean to you? #11
- 5 Cool Things You Can Do With Your DNA
- What does DNA mean to you? #10
- DNA Excerpt: Bringing Home the Birkin
- DNA Video: DNA Replication by The Backrow
- Rule of Thumb on Speeches About Science
11/26/2008 07:15 pm
1 Comment - Singapore Company DNA Dynasty Will (Not) Tell Your Children’s Future
11/24/2008 02:08 am
2 Comments - Analysts Say deCODE Genetics Headed for Bankruptcy Court
11/23/2008 07:34 pm
2 Comments - Singapore Biotech Sector Loses Stem Cell Researcher Alan Colman
11/22/2008 11:59 am
6 Comments - Gene Genie #18 with the PG Tips Chimp
10/23/2007 09:28 am
38 Comments - Business of DNA
- DNA @ Google Answers
- DNA and Disease
- DNA and Genealogy
- DNA and the Law
- DNA Around the World
- DNA Fun
- DNA in General
- DNA Inventions and Gadgets
- DNA Lab Talk
- DNA Podcasts and Videos
- DNA Quotes and Excerpts
- DNA Testing
- Gene Therapy
- Genetic Engineering
- Genetically Modified Foods and Organisms
- Jobs Involving DNA
- Personalities with DNA
- Polls About DNA
RECENT POSTS
RECENT COMMENTS
CATEGORIES
ARCHIVE
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
RANDOMIZED BLOGROLL
- Behavioral Ecology Blog
- The Loom
- Women’s Bioethics Blog
- Scientiae
- GMO Africa
- Techmedicine
- DNA Direct Talk
- John Hawks Anthropology Weblog
- Genome Boy
- Genetizen
| We comply with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information: verify here. |
WHAT??? You mean all the CSI shows have been lieing to us?? DNA isn’t ready instantly, or atleast later the same day???? How shocking! I’m so disillusioned!
Steve: You really shouldn’t be watching so much TV.
50 years? Easily within 10. Now, in 50 years, you will be arrested by the thought police for thinking of committing a crime, so these DNA analysis tools will be obsolete. I know because I saw it in a movie…
I was thinking about this stuff the other day. Why do you think prosecutors fight so hard to keep DNA evidence out? I have trouble believing they are all so calculating that they want to put innocents to death to further their careers. How often are these DNA tests wrong (whether lab error or some other thing)? Do you think they’re worried about guilty folks going free?
Steve James: Hey! It’s my lucky day when all the Steves come to visit (I’ve got on in my house too).
Ok so back on topic. Ah yes, the thought police as epitomized by the marvelous Tom Cruise, Mr. Deep Thought himself.
Barry: Is that true? I had no idea prosecutors disliked DNA evidence. Or did you see that on TV too?!
According to this article by Edward Lazarus on prosecutorial resistance to DNA evidence for exonerating people convicted of crimes, prosecutors often face pressure from victims’ families not to admit error because they want to believe the case is closed and want to put it behind them. Interesting read.