New York To Collect More DNA for State Database
by Dr. Hsien-Hsien Lei
Posted May 14, 2007 in DNA and the Law
New York State is set to start collecting more DNA for its state database . As of May 9, 2007, almost 250,000 offender samples have been collected and approved for analysis. Under Gov. Eliot Spitzer’s proposal, DNA will be collected from:
- People found guilty of crimes at the misdemeanor level or higher, including those who were convicted of minor drug offenses, harassment, or credit card theft.
- All prisoners in the state
- All parolees
- Everyone on probation
- Registered sex offenders
Not only is the DNA database expected to make it easier to nail the guilty, it’s also to serve the innocent who were wrongly accused. Prisoners and defendents who were previously not given court orders to have DNA evidence tested against their own, can now request one as well as ask that it be compared against the DNA database.
The UK has the largest national DNA database in the world. According to the Home Office, only 0.5% of people in the US have their DNA entered in a database compared to 5.2% of the UK population. Here’s one case study they cite to prove that DNA databases help solve crimes:
In Canterbury in 1988, an 11 year old and a nine year old girl were raped and indecently assaulted. In Derby in 2001, a shoplifter was arrested and a DNA sample taken. His DNA matched the 1998 crime scene samples. The offender pleaded guilty to the 1988 offences and was sentenced to 15 years imprisonment.
The question is – Does fear of a DNA database help deter crime as well?
The New York Times, May 14, 2007
Tags: new york, dna database, eliot spitzer, genetics, genes, dna, crime, law, criminals, genome
Related Posts:
South Africa’s DNA Project Launches Website...
DNA Goes to the Tigers...
5 Facts (and Caveats) About DNA Profiling...
Fake Names in the UK National DNA Database...
Police Want to Collect Abandoned DNA from Everyone...
State Laws Governing Genetic Discrimination...
Eye on DNA Headlines for 30 April 2008...
8 Comments
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
Search Eye on DNA
- Genetic Genealogy on Faces of America
- DNA Network Tweet Cloud
- DNA{wesome}
- Genetics = Real Science
- Larry David’s DNA Test
- Lopez Tonight First Late-Night Show to Offer DNA Testing
- American Genes Don’t Exist
- Knowledge about Genetic Risk is Power or is it Fear?
- Murderer Gets Reduced Sentence Because His Genes Made Him Do It
- Video: Knome’s Ari Kiirikki Speaks with Medgadget
MOST POPULAR
- DNA Toys: Ben 10 and Digimon Digivice
- 100 Facts About DNA
- Salaries for Jobs in Genetics
- Fetal Gender DNA Tests Answer Common Pregnancy Question...Or Not
- What does DNA mean to you?
- Eye on DNA Interview: Dr. Tzung-Fu Hsieh of RedTracer DNA Test for the Red Hair Gene, MC1R
- Books About DNA: The Crime of Reason by Robert B. Laughlin
- Genetically Modified Organisms Bring in the Cash
- Navigenics Introduces Physician Portal and Annual Insight Service
- Parenting Children Using Genetic Tests
- People Who’ve Had Their Genomes Sequenced
09/29/2009 07:03 am
8 Comments - Larry David’s DNA Test
11/17/2009 02:52 am
1 Comment - 23andMe DNA Tests for $399, Down From $999
09/10/2008 04:33 am
6 Comments - Crazy Genetic Marketing Ideas
07/05/2008 09:14 pm
7 Comments - Parenting Children Using Genetic Tests
05/18/2009 02:09 am
4 Comments - Business of DNA
- DNA @ Google Answers
- DNA and Disease
- DNA and Genealogy
- DNA and the Law
- DNA Around the World
- DNA Fun
- DNA in General
- DNA Inventions and Gadgets
- DNA Lab Talk
- DNA Podcasts and Videos
- DNA Quotes and Excerpts
- DNA Testing
- Gene Therapy
- Genetic Engineering
- Genetically Modified Foods and Organisms
- Jobs Involving DNA
- Personalities with DNA
- Polls About DNA
RECENT POSTS
RECENT COMMENTS
CATEGORIES
ARCHIVE
- January 2010
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
RANDOMIZED BLOGROLL
- Six Impossible Things Before Breakfast
- Tangled Bank
- Elefante Jirafa
- The Tree of Life
- Alltop Science
- SciGuy
- The force that through…
- Mary Meets Dolly
- BioCrowd
- Genomics Revolution
| We comply with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information: verify here. |
I know I’m probably going to be horribly persecuted for saying this, but, I don’t really know how I feel about having DNA on record.
On one hand, the benefits are obvious. Help catch the guilty and keep the innocent free.
On the other hand, I can’t ignore the weighty feeling it gives me of being controlled.
I know the positives far outweigh the negatives right now, though.
Alicia, You’re not going to be persecuted! And if anyone tries, they’ll have me to answer to.
I think you’ve voiced the number one concern most people have about the increasing use of DNA technology – privacy. How do we know our DNA won’t be used in other ways that could affect our ability to get a job, health insurance, or other freedoms in our lives? This is why it’s important for everyone to understand the basics of DNA and to know how it can be used. Even CSI is useful in this respect. If criminals know that it’s easier to catch them, maybe they’ll think twice.
Still, two years later and no deterance to crime Dr. Hsien. Laws do not deter crime or criminals, punishment (death penelty) and long sentences deter crime by those put to death and those locked up. Even those locked up still commit crimes behind bars. Laws such as collecting DNA from Law abidding citizens or gun control only impose penelties on the law abidding and impose control over the people by the government. I know that this article does not deal with collection of DNA from anything less then the listed misdermeanors, and that is fine with me, because I never plan to be in one of those classes. But I understand they are now proposing to collect from any one arrested. And that is wrong. One can be arrested for swaring at the police, jay walking, speeding or falsely. Those who trade liberty for security deserve neither! BF
I am not sure that collection of DNA will be a deterrent. Most criminals are not that smart (some are) to be thinking about the consequences or even be aware that they are leaving DNA at a crime scene. Secondly, in a “crime of passion” the actor(s) are usually irrational to begin with, and will not be thinking about possibly getting caught, going to jail, going to trail and being presented with evidence against them.
I do think it is a good idea to collect the DNA from criminals, especially sexual predators and the like. I am concerned about privacy as you stated above. In the wrong hands, DNA information could potentially ruin someone’s ability to earn a living, get insurance, buy a home, etc.
[...] make sure the candidate isn’t a crime suspect by comparing his/her DNA with DNA databases. According to another interview with Noel Perry, Assistant Commissioner of the Ethical Standards [...]
[...] crime scenes and suspects. There is no “convicted offender database” such as the ones in the US and UK that additionally hold DNA from people who’ve been charged with a crime, convicted criminals, [...]
[...] databases of DNA from criminals and assorted random people are the subject of contentious debate in New York State and Great Britain, a DNA database for tigers called the American Tiger Registry is also being [...]
[...] points of reference, Australia’s national DNA database has over 350,000 DNA samples while New York State has almost 250,000. You may also be interested in these previous posts about the UK national [...]