I would like to reply to your suggestion “Did you catch this part? It make me laugh… Only 6,000? Why not 8,000?”

Despite the poor grammar and the hyperbole, you actually raise a great question. The text you are referring to actually applies to our SpaGen product. The questionnaire and DNA analysis, supported by 6,000 evidence-based rules, was developed and is supervised by board-licensed physicians and pharmacists. It has passed due diligence with Caremark - the nation’s largest pharmacy-benefits manager who is responsible for most prescriptions dispensed in the United States - over 1 billion annually. They current intend to use it to guide the nutritional supplementation of their 96,000 full-time employees. And Caremark is exploring other options for the questionnaire as well. It may make you laugh, or even Peggy, but your laughter is based more on your opinion rather than the facts. Rather than opinion, the facts about Salugen make the nation’s largest and most credible company dispensing prescriptions take note and actually use our SpaGen questionnaire to guide nutritional supplementation in a scientific, evidence-based fashion.

So, I know I asked for an interview opportunity before, figuring that you would interested in the facts. I hope that you are still interested in facts, instead of inaccurate grammar and ridiculous hyperbole and conjecture that is not based upon evidence.

I hope you do not consider this a “bash”, as Salugen does not need to bash as we are based upon evidence. But I was wondering if your statement could be considered so? Thanks for the chance to respond.

Thanks for your comment. You stated that if a person does not have one of the markers included in the Salugen test then s/he would not have a “genetic problem.” I’m not sure what your background is in genetics, but it is highly likely that more than five gene variants are involved in the etiology of obesity.

And may I say that it is probably fortunate rather than unfortunate if a person’s obesity is caused more by environment than by genes. Lifestyle factors and other environmental contributions are far easier to manipulate than genes at this point in time.

I’m glad you are so confident in Salugen and DNASOA. I’ll be interviewing Salugen CEO Brian Meshkin soon and will be in touch to see if anyone at DNASOA would do an interview with me as well.

Thanks again,
Hsien

They are testing for 5 different genetic markers that may give you a propensity toward obesity. If you do not have one of the markers, unfortunately, it is not a genetic problem that you are suffering from. Therefore, Salugen and DNASOA would not have anything to offer.

DNASOA is a relatively new company, and we are still trying to build new relationships, and offices in wider areas. They would never create a relationship that would jeopardize the future of the company.

By applying 6000 evidence-based rules to information collected from a health and wellness profile, as well as the results of your genetic test, we are able to create a one-of-a-kind supplement to promote overall tissue, organ, skeletal and systemic wellness.

Only 6,000? Why not 8,000?

Watch them come bash me.