Partial DNA Match for Nailing Criminals
by Dr. Hsien-Hsien Lei
Posted May 25, 2007 in DNA and the Law
If a member of your family has committed a crime and been made to submit a DNA sample to CODIS, the FBI-run Combined DNA Index System, you’d better stay out of trouble yourself. Even if your DNA profile is not in the database, a partial match between a crime scene sample and your relative’s could still lead investigators to you.
Partial DNA match can also be used to exonerate wrongly convicted people. Darryl Hunt spent 19 years behind bars for rape and murder before a partial match was made to a felon named Anthony Brown. This match then led to Brown’s older brother, Willard.
Denver District Attorney Mitch Morrissey has been working to have every state in the U.S. approve partial DNA matches for investigating crime. Already common in the UK, the approach is called “familial DNA.” The practice has drawn media attention lately because critics believe it could be an invasion of privacy.
Stephen Mercer, a Maryland attorney, said in a 60 Minutes report – A Not So Perfect Match:
Now you’re subjecting a whole new class of innocent people to genetic surveillance by the government.
With this new technology, no one has ever considered, ‘Well, if my brother’s DNA ends up in the database, and he’s forfeited his privacy rights by becoming a convicted felon, has he also forfeited my privacy rights, as well, as a wholly innocent family member.” That puts me under lifelong genetic surveillance.
Should we be afraid of partial match even if we have never committed and have no intention of ever commiting a crime?
NB: You can also watch the video version of Lesley Stahl’s 60 Minutes report.
Tags: partial match, familial DNA, crime, genetics, genes, dna, criminals

Related Posts:
London Bus Drivers Get DNA Spit Kits...
Crazy Genetic Marketing Ideas...
ATG Start Codons in London...
New York To Collect More DNA for State Database...
What’s in your DNA? #9...
Trial By DNA...
DNA Excerpt: Bringing Home the Birkin...
4 Comments
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
Search Eye on DNA
- Genetic Genealogy on Faces of America
- DNA Network Tweet Cloud
- DNA{wesome}
- Genetics = Real Science
- Larry David’s DNA Test
- Lopez Tonight First Late-Night Show to Offer DNA Testing
- American Genes Don’t Exist
- Knowledge about Genetic Risk is Power or is it Fear?
- Murderer Gets Reduced Sentence Because His Genes Made Him Do It
- Video: Knome’s Ari Kiirikki Speaks with Medgadget
MOST POPULAR
- DNA Toys: Ben 10 and Digimon Digivice
- 100 Facts About DNA
- Salaries for Jobs in Genetics
- Fetal Gender DNA Tests Answer Common Pregnancy Question...Or Not
- What does DNA mean to you?
- Eye on DNA Interview: Dr. Tzung-Fu Hsieh of RedTracer DNA Test for the Red Hair Gene, MC1R
- Books About DNA: The Crime of Reason by Robert B. Laughlin
- Genetically Modified Organisms Bring in the Cash
- Navigenics Introduces Physician Portal and Annual Insight Service
- Parenting Children Using Genetic Tests
- People Who’ve Had Their Genomes Sequenced
09/29/2009 07:03 am
8 Comments - Larry David’s DNA Test
11/17/2009 02:52 am
1 Comment - 23andMe DNA Tests for $399, Down From $999
09/10/2008 04:33 am
6 Comments - Crazy Genetic Marketing Ideas
07/05/2008 09:14 pm
7 Comments - Parenting Children Using Genetic Tests
05/18/2009 02:09 am
4 Comments - Business of DNA
- DNA @ Google Answers
- DNA and Disease
- DNA and Genealogy
- DNA and the Law
- DNA Around the World
- DNA Fun
- DNA in General
- DNA Inventions and Gadgets
- DNA Lab Talk
- DNA Podcasts and Videos
- DNA Quotes and Excerpts
- DNA Testing
- Gene Therapy
- Genetic Engineering
- Genetically Modified Foods and Organisms
- Jobs Involving DNA
- Personalities with DNA
- Polls About DNA
RECENT POSTS
RECENT COMMENTS
CATEGORIES
ARCHIVE
- January 2010
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
RANDOMIZED BLOGROLL
- FuturePundit
- Colblindor
- Adventures in Ethics and Science
- HealthNex
- Professor Olsen @Large
- Mary Meets Dolly
- A View from England
- Sciencebase Science Blog
- Epigenetics News
- The Loom
| We comply with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information: verify here. |




That’s pretty scary to think that by a partial match that one could be convicted of a crime. I would hope that it catches more wrongdoers than innocents though. I will update my sidebar with your new site link!
Thanks for coming by, NP! I have great hope that DNA technology will do a lot of good for society but also a little trepidation that in the wrong hands, genetic data will be badly abused. Keep your eyes open!
partial dna evidence does not work. take it from me who has personal experience. my dna was taken for a motoring offence in 2005, 9 months later i was arrested for a crime that was commited 200 miles away from my home and held for 8 hours. the person who left his dna at the scene, according to eye-witnesses, was thin, 30 and had short hair. i am described as fat, 40 and follicly forgotten. police knew this but hey why let the facts get in the way of a “good” arrest. had i resembled this guy i would be in jail right now. forensic science services said there was strong evidence in the partial dna evidence to suggest it was me. i have been severely disabled for two and half years and need walking aids.
Wow, Pat. Thanks for sharing your story. All the best. I hope your disability isn’t associated with the mistaken arrest.