Dr. James Le Fanu Rolls His Eyes At Genes
by Dr. Hsien-Hsien Lei
Posted June 11, 2007 in DNA and Disease, DNA in General
In the Sunday Telegraph yesterday, Dr. James Le Fanu laments, “We don’t understand our genes.” Unfortunately, it appears that it’s Dr. Le Fanu himself who doesn’t understand genes. He claims that there is “nothing in the genes” to explain why animals turn out so differently from each other. I suspect it’s been years since he’s had a basic genetics course that would have explained promoters, gene splicing, and epigenetics.
He further claims that diabetes* and arthritis are not inherited diseases and that looking for genetic causes is a “hopeless enterprise.” Oh, really? Studies of families and twins say otherwise. And try telling the thousands of research teams currently engaged in genome wide scans for disease susceptibility genes that they’re wasting their time.
The fact is, we look for genes not just to “find a cure,” but also to understand what makes us tick. DNA isn’t an “insoluble riddle” because if that were the case, Watson and Crick (and Rosalind Franklin too) wouldn’t have been able to figure out its double helical shape. And one other thing, DNA hasn’t “promised more than it delivers” because it hasn’t promised us anything except being the very basis of life and all the unpredictability that comes along with it.
One thing that I can agree with Dr. Le Fanu on - “the answer does not lie in the genes.” Because what is an answer but a response to a question? And questions there are aplenty.
*See Genetic epidemiology of diabetes by M. Alan Permutt, Jonathon Wasson and Nancy Cox in JCI, 2005.
Tags: genetics, genes, dna, james le fanu, diseases, medicine, health, genomics, genome, genome scan

Related Posts:
7 Things I Love About DNA...
DNA Auction: African-American Sisters’ Copy of Avoid Boring People by James Watson...
DNA Video: Dr. James Watson at Google...
DNA Quote of the Day: Dr. James Watson...
Breaking DNA News: James Watson Resigns...
DNA Video: James Watson at the Wellcome Trust...
DNA Video: The Secret of Life...
Please note that comments left using the form below will be publicly displayed. If you'd like to correspond with me privately, please email me at hsien@eyeondna.com.
If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it's probably in moderation. I will approve it as soon as I can! Thanks for your patience.
8 Comments »
Note: Posting will be sporadic while I'm on maternity leave.
Search Eye on DNA
- Consumer Genetics Show 2009 in Boston
- Rule of Thumb on Speeches About Science
- Analysts Say deCODE Genetics Headed for Bankruptcy Court
- Genetically Engineered HTC Touch Diamond Phone
- Putting Your DNA To Use In Bad Economic Times
- Singapore Company DNA Dynasty Will (Not) Tell Your Children’s Future
- Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD): A Discussion
- Family History of Disease Scares Parents More Than Genetic Test Results
- How Many Ways Can A Physician Be Sued (Over Genetic Tests)?
- Server Issues
MOST POPULAR
- DNA Toys: Ben 10 and Digimon Digivice
- 100 Facts About DNA
- Salaries for Jobs in Genetics
- Want a job? Submit your DNA
- What does DNA mean to you? #14
- What does DNA mean to you? #11
- 5 Cool Things You Can Do With Your DNA
- What does DNA mean to you? #10
- DNA Excerpt: Bringing Home the Birkin
- DNA Video: DNA Replication by The Backrow
- Rule of Thumb on Speeches About Science
11/26/2008 07:15 pm
1 Comment - Singapore Company DNA Dynasty Will (Not) Tell Your Children’s Future
11/24/2008 02:08 am
2 Comments - Analysts Say deCODE Genetics Headed for Bankruptcy Court
11/23/2008 07:34 pm
2 Comments - Singapore Biotech Sector Loses Stem Cell Researcher Alan Colman
11/22/2008 11:59 am
6 Comments - Gene Genie #18 with the PG Tips Chimp
10/23/2007 09:28 am
38 Comments - Business of DNA
- DNA @ Google Answers
- DNA and Disease
- DNA and Genealogy
- DNA and the Law
- DNA Around the World
- DNA Fun
- DNA in General
- DNA Inventions and Gadgets
- DNA Lab Talk
- DNA Podcasts and Videos
- DNA Quotes and Excerpts
- DNA Testing
- Gene Therapy
- Genetic Engineering
- Genetically Modified Foods and Organisms
- Jobs Involving DNA
- Personalities with DNA
- Polls About DNA
RECENT POSTS
RECENT COMMENTS
CATEGORIES
ARCHIVE
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
RANDOMIZED BLOGROLL
- The Issue
- Pharyngula
- Emergiblog
- The Genetic Genealogist
- Tangled Bank
- Yann Klimentidis’ Weblog
- Off The Road
- Duncan Riley
- Nurse Practitioner News
- Modulator
| We comply with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information: verify here. |





Articles like that make me froth at the mouth a little (not a pleasant sight). It’s not so much that there are people who are ignorant of biology. It’s that newspapers seemingly can’t be bothered to fact check anything having to do with science and that physicians (and I assume Le Fanu is a MD) are given undue authority, when many haven’t had a biology course in decades. I hope someone writes a nice letter to the editor (hint, hint).
If I write a letter to the editor, it won’t be very nice…. hehe Do they even have Letters to the Editor anymore? I thought blogs superceded that function! LOL
The comment about “here is nothing in the genes of a fly to explain why it should have six legs, a pair of wings and a brain the size of a full stop” is most telling, as we know an awful lot about the first two. Various mutations which convert one body part to another (such as antennae to legs) and which determine the number of body segments have been extensively studied in Drosophila, and the sages of Stockholm have recognized this with at least one Nobel Prize (for homeotic genes).
I suspect that Le Fanu is also befuddled by the difference between the similarities in gene counts between flies, worms, mice and humans and the differences in gene content. For example, we can clearly see that humans have many defective copies of olfactory receptors vs. the complements in species such as dogs and mice, which correlates with the far superior sense of smell in those organisms. Conversely, we can see (!) at a molecular level an explanation (in terms of different receptors) why we have trichromatic color vision while certain other mammals have essentially monochromatic vision. We can assign a lot of genes to the immune system, genes which are absent from invertebrates.
As long as the genome project has been gathering headlines & funding, there have been ‘genome reactionaries’ arguing against the importance of genes. Indeed, this camp feels that the money & time spent on genomic association studies is wasted. Le Fanu is voicing the reductio ad absurdum version of this, which says that genetics means nothing. He seems to be remembering many older studies which were poorly powered and apparently believes that the genetic association community has learned nothing from their past mistakes. In particular, the study sizes are getting enormous and candidate genes can immediately be identified. While some of these candidates are pure head-scratchers, more than a few have strong connections to relevant biology.
I don’t know about a letter to the editor, but I did send the chap an email inviting to comment in this forum.
Yikes. I don’t know what happened, Keith, but your great comment got eaten by Akismet spam catcher. Booo.
Anyway, I recommend to Dr. Le Fanu that he read The Agile Gene by Matt Ridley. It will answer many of his questions and more. That is, if he doesn’t know it all already.
My local paper has letters, but it’s mostly complaints about road construction and the City Council. They would probably be very confused if they received a letter about the content of an article (not that they publish much science news).
[...] 5. DNA is a mystery. And everyone loves a good mystery, including Liz Strauss and her gang. (As for you, Dr. Le Fanu, I don’t still don’t agree that it’s an “insoluble riddle.”) [...]
This is a very disturbing article. My goal after getting admitted to a genetic counseling school is to get on national tv for just one night on a Sunday night on ABC or CBS and explain to the people how our genes function, what we can learn from our genes, how our genes relate to health and disease, how genes relate to inheritance, how DNA testing is done what it can show (the flaws of the testing as well), family history, and human/legal affairs related to genetics.
All I want to do is touch on the very basics. If others would love to join me in this task, it would be greatly appreciated. We need to reach out to the community (being the global population) to help them be exposed to what genes are, and all of the other topics I mentioned in the above paragraph.
Good for you, NA! DNA is already in the public consciousness but with articles like Dr. Le Fanu’s, it’s getting a tarnished image!