Drug Companies Should Offer Free DNA Tests
by Dr. Hsien-Hsien Lei
Posted June 19, 2007 in DNA Testing, DNA and Disease
Genetic testing is set to change the practice of medicine. In The New York Times today, Dr. Richard A. Friedman writes about personalized medicine for psychiatry. He believes:
- Direct-to-consumer advertising will become meaningless when consumers need to know their own genetic profile first.
- Drug reps will no longer be able to give doctors prescription information without taking into account genetic data.
While Dr. Friedman’s prediction (wish?) that direct-to-consumer advertising and drug reps will no longer exist, I believe that pharmaceutical companies will get wise to direct-to-consumer genetic testing and add it to their arsenal. For example, they may decide to offer genetic testing for free if the customer agrees to take whichever one of their drugs is most compatible. Getting genetic info gratis is actually a good bargain for the consumer because the information can be used in the context of other treatment considerations.
Genetic information on customers would be a boon for drug companies as well. They could use that info to determine which drugs have the highest potential for profitability (based on the number of potential patients with specific genetic profiles) and fine tune the drugs in development. Once a person’s genetic profile is in the company database, they could personalize direct-to-consumer advertising either via email or direct mail. Could be a win-win situation for both the consumers and pharmaceutical industry as long as the genetic data are used only for improving people’s health.
As for the drug reps, maybe they could be trained to take DNA samples and when DNA genotyping becomes portable, they could do on-the-spot genetic testing in doctor’s offices. All courtesy of the drug company.
Any pharmaceutical companies reading? I just gave you a free 30 minute consult!
Tags: pharmaceutical, drug companies, genetics, genes, dna, personalized medicine, psychiatry, genome, genomics, genetic testing, dna tests, medicine, health

Related Posts:
DNA Quote: Kevin Kelly...
Eye On DNA Is Rated R...
Eye on DNA Headlines for 27 September 2007...
Genetic Testing for Psychiatric Diseases...
Types of Genetic Tests...
The Rough Guide to Genes & Cloning...
Intermediary Genetic Testing Companies Face Less Regulation...
Please note that comments left using the form below will be publicly displayed. If you'd like to correspond with me privately, please email me at hsien@eyeondna.com.
If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it's probably in moderation. I will approve it as soon as I can! Thanks for your patience.
8 Comments »
Note: Posting will be sporadic while I'm on maternity leave.
Search Eye on DNA
- Consumer Genetics Show 2009 in Boston
- Rule of Thumb on Speeches About Science
- Analysts Say deCODE Genetics Headed for Bankruptcy Court
- Genetically Engineered HTC Touch Diamond Phone
- Putting Your DNA To Use In Bad Economic Times
- Singapore Company DNA Dynasty Will (Not) Tell Your Children’s Future
- Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD): A Discussion
- Family History of Disease Scares Parents More Than Genetic Test Results
- How Many Ways Can A Physician Be Sued (Over Genetic Tests)?
- Server Issues
MOST POPULAR
- DNA Toys: Ben 10 and Digimon Digivice
- 100 Facts About DNA
- Salaries for Jobs in Genetics
- Want a job? Submit your DNA
- What does DNA mean to you? #14
- What does DNA mean to you? #11
- 5 Cool Things You Can Do With Your DNA
- What does DNA mean to you? #10
- DNA Excerpt: Bringing Home the Birkin
- DNA Video: DNA Replication by The Backrow
- Rule of Thumb on Speeches About Science
11/26/2008 07:15 pm
1 Comment - Singapore Company DNA Dynasty Will (Not) Tell Your Children’s Future
11/24/2008 02:08 am
2 Comments - Analysts Say deCODE Genetics Headed for Bankruptcy Court
11/23/2008 07:34 pm
2 Comments - Singapore Biotech Sector Loses Stem Cell Researcher Alan Colman
11/22/2008 11:59 am
6 Comments - Gene Genie #18 with the PG Tips Chimp
10/23/2007 09:28 am
38 Comments - Business of DNA
- DNA @ Google Answers
- DNA and Disease
- DNA and Genealogy
- DNA and the Law
- DNA Around the World
- DNA Fun
- DNA in General
- DNA Inventions and Gadgets
- DNA Lab Talk
- DNA Podcasts and Videos
- DNA Quotes and Excerpts
- DNA Testing
- Gene Therapy
- Genetic Engineering
- Genetically Modified Foods and Organisms
- Jobs Involving DNA
- Personalities with DNA
- Polls About DNA
RECENT POSTS
RECENT COMMENTS
CATEGORIES
ARCHIVE
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
RANDOMIZED BLOGROLL
- The Panda’s Thumb
- ScienceRoll
- nodalpoint.org
- Twisted Bacteria
- QUEST Science Blog
- FuturePundit
- Infrared Sauna Info
- Enoch Choi at MedHelp
- The Inoculated Mind
- Genomics Policy
| We comply with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information: verify here. |





Thanks Hsien,
I can’t wait for even more “lab reps” as if drug reps didn’t take up enough of your time!
-Steve
http://www.thegenesherpa.blogspot.com
hehehe You love it. I hear most of the drug reps are eye candy.
Yep, pers-med will just mean even more reps, because there will be so many more drugs and all those test kits to sell to physicians.
db
If those test kits are in nice bags, I’ll take one.
yes, the cost of DNA testing will drop precipitously over the next few years, so free testing for all patients will be a likely prospect, but the drug reps will still be there, even if it means that the “product name” they are selling has variants based on genetic results. For example, I think some treatents may be “customized” to one person (expensive), while others may simply require selecting from 10 or 12 “variants” of a drug (less expensive) - for either, the overall branding will remnain as strong and important as ever.
Totally agree! I think it’s a positive development although I’m sure some privacy experts and ethicists will disagree.
[...] drug companies listened to me after all.* The International Serious Adverse Event Consortium, made-up of seven pharmaceutical [...]
[...] Kind of what I said - Drug Companies Should Offer Free DNA Tests. [...]