Storing and Testing Children’s DNA
by Dr. Hsien-Hsien Lei
Posted June 20, 2007 in DNA Testing, DNA and Disease, DNA in General

Have you taken the current Eye on DNA poll? Should guardians decide whether children should get genetic testing? Or should children make their own decision once they’re of legal age? Readers of the Eye on DNA poll below who believe guardians hold the power are in the lead. These results mirror those from the CS Mott Children’s Hospital National Poll on Children’s Health that surveyed over 2,000 adults in the US.
-
38% of parents would store their child’s DNA in a government biobank, the same percentage would store their own DNA
-
54% of adults would get genetic testing for disease risk prediction even if there’s no treatment or cure
-
39% of adults would get genetic testing only when there’s effective treatment
Lead researcher Dr. Beth Tarini:
Some adults feel that even without a treatment, genetic testing will better prepare them to deal with an illness. Others may simply hope that testing may lead to the faster development of a cure.
What do you think about genetic testing and DNA biobanks? If you haven’t taken the poll yet, it’s below the fold.
Tags: genetic testing, dna tests, genetics, genes, dna, child health, children, kids, parenting, medicine, health

Related Posts:
American Journal of Medical Genetics Special Issue on Children and Genetics...
DNA Direct Launches DNA Archive for Home DNA Storage...
Types of Genetic Tests...
Newborn Genetic Screening vs Right to Privacy...
Eye on DNA Headlines for 28 August 2007 and a Poll on DNA Storage...
DNA Paternity Testing Myths...
DNA Video: Sequenom Prenatal Genetic Testing...
Please note that comments left using the form below will be publicly displayed. If you'd like to correspond with me privately, please email me at hsien@eyeondna.com.
If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it's probably in moderation. I will approve it as soon as I can! Thanks for your patience.
5 Comments »
Note: Posting will be sporadic while I'm on maternity leave.
Search Eye on DNA
- Consumer Genetics Show 2009 in Boston
- Rule of Thumb on Speeches About Science
- Analysts Say deCODE Genetics Headed for Bankruptcy Court
- Genetically Engineered HTC Touch Diamond Phone
- Putting Your DNA To Use In Bad Economic Times
- Singapore Company DNA Dynasty Will (Not) Tell Your Children’s Future
- Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD): A Discussion
- Family History of Disease Scares Parents More Than Genetic Test Results
- How Many Ways Can A Physician Be Sued (Over Genetic Tests)?
- Server Issues
MOST POPULAR
- DNA Toys: Ben 10 and Digimon Digivice
- 100 Facts About DNA
- Salaries for Jobs in Genetics
- Want a job? Submit your DNA
- What does DNA mean to you? #14
- What does DNA mean to you? #11
- 5 Cool Things You Can Do With Your DNA
- What does DNA mean to you? #10
- DNA Excerpt: Bringing Home the Birkin
- DNA Video: DNA Replication by The Backrow
- Rule of Thumb on Speeches About Science
11/26/2008 07:15 pm
1 Comment - Singapore Company DNA Dynasty Will (Not) Tell Your Children’s Future
11/24/2008 02:08 am
2 Comments - Analysts Say deCODE Genetics Headed for Bankruptcy Court
11/23/2008 07:34 pm
2 Comments - Singapore Biotech Sector Loses Stem Cell Researcher Alan Colman
11/22/2008 11:59 am
6 Comments - Gene Genie #18 with the PG Tips Chimp
10/23/2007 09:28 am
38 Comments - Business of DNA
- DNA @ Google Answers
- DNA and Disease
- DNA and Genealogy
- DNA and the Law
- DNA Around the World
- DNA Fun
- DNA in General
- DNA Inventions and Gadgets
- DNA Lab Talk
- DNA Podcasts and Videos
- DNA Quotes and Excerpts
- DNA Testing
- Gene Therapy
- Genetic Engineering
- Genetically Modified Foods and Organisms
- Jobs Involving DNA
- Personalities with DNA
- Polls About DNA
RECENT POSTS
RECENT COMMENTS
CATEGORIES
ARCHIVE
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
RANDOMIZED BLOGROLL
- Genomicron
- Biotech Blog
- Sandwalk
- Baby Biotechs
- Genes & Drugs Blog
- The Science Creative Quarterly
- Epidemix
- Sciencebase Science Blog
- MRSA Notes
- Tangled Bank
| We comply with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information: verify here. |





I think this type of question should be broken up into separate types of questions. For example, should parents have a choice for having their child tested for complex diseases only? Should parents have a choice for having their child tested for monogenic disorders only?
I think there will eventually be a policy where all major disorders and diseases (both monogenic and complex) will be screened for during pregnancy. The down fall on this is the unexpected mutation that can arise that leads a person to having a disorder or disease when the first test done (during pregnancy) showed no mutation for a certain disorder or disease.
Yes, my poll is very primitive and simplistic.
As for prenatal screening, this is from an interview of Ravegen’s Dr. Rav Dhallan I did earlier this year:
The full interview of Dr. Dhallan from March 2007 in case anyone’s interested.
~~~~~
In Joan Rothschild’s The Dream of the Perfect Child, she looks at how prenatal testing has changed the way families experience pregnancy and public perception of disability. About three decades ago, ultrasound, amniocentesis, and other prenatal tests became a routine part of a pregnant woman’s prenatal care. Since then, parents have agonized before, during, and after the tests.
Ravgen is offering one more means of prenatal testing that is much less invasive to both the pregnant mother and her unborn child since it analyzes fetal DNA in maternal blood; only a blood draw is required. But the impact of making prenatal testing even easier than before means that more of us will be under pressure to find out all we can about our babies and to to make sure our children are as perfect as we can make them. On the other hand, it also means that parents and healthcare providers can be better prepared to handle a child with special needs once he or she is born.
Yesterday, I had the chance to talk to Ravgen Chairman and CEO Dr. Ravinder Dhallan about their technology and his vision for its use. One of the first things I asked about was a feature of Ravgen (video) that aired on WUSA Channel 9 Washington DC. In it, Ravgen staff Sarah Emche talked about the “incredible peace of mind†the test gave her family during each of her two pregnancies. That struck me as an overstatement considering all of the various congenital defects that are possible and for which no prenatal tests exist.
While Dr. Dhallan agrees, he also says that prenatal tests like Ravgen’s are just extra tools to be used in prenatal diagnosis. Genetic testing won’t ever replace technologies like ultrasound that’s capable of diagnosing structural abnormalities in the fetus. However, there is great promise for prenatal tests that can analyze specific genetic loci and mutations. The Ravgen test is currently limited to detecting Down’s syndrome in which there is an extra chromosome 21, but theoretically it could be adapted to identify other types of genetic variations as well.
For instance, if a mother knew that her child carried the p16 mutation that predisposed him to melanoma, she could perhaps be extra careful to prevent sun damage from birth*. Dr. Dhallan’s vision is to identify as many such disorders as possible that can be prevented or treated easily if they’re diagnosed early enough. He believes that it’s possible to make a bigger impact if you can diagnose someone in utero since rare genetic disorders will most likely remain hidden until much later in life when the disease surfaces and it’s too late for preventive measures.
At this point, you might be thinking about preimplantation genetic diagnosis that has been approved for a number of genetic mutations, including the BRCA genes, which increase a person’s risk of breast and ovarian cancers. Those embryos that carry the mutations being screened would be discarded in favor of those that don’t. Similarly, a prenatal test could come to the same conclusion but at a much later stage of the pregnancy. And then there is the question of when to perform such genetic tests - before a child is born or after.
So we’ve gotten to the controversy. As Rebecca Taylor of Mary Meets Dolly often reminds us, parents who choose not to have children with known genetic defects forget that in the future, treatments and cures could become available. If we focus on prenatal testing more than on the disease itself, we may never gain the momentum we need to eradicate the disease instead of the person.
The reality is prenatal tests are already available and commonplace. The hope is that with new technologies like Ravgen’s, we will reduce the risk of undergoing prenatal testing and increase their accuracy. And the better information we have, the better able we are to make good choices about our health and our lives.
*Myriad Genetics offers Melaris, a genetic test for hereditary melanoma that identifies mutations in the p16 gene.
Yes, Dr. Dhallan’s hit it on the head. The guy is brilliant! Can you please provide a contact email so I can get in touch with Dr. Dhallan’s? You can send his email, or work of employment - I can do the searching from there- to my informal email addy: p53mehrproject@yahoo.com
Thank you!
[...] for BRCA1/2 be permitted for minors? Opinions of BRCA mutation carriers and their adult offspring (Eye on DNA, press [...]