Genetics Websites from Harvard University and the World Health Organization
by Dr. Hsien-Hsien Lei
Posted July 28, 2007 in DNA Testing, DNA in General, Eye on DNA Headlines
Two comments this week led me to great genetics websites that I think you should visit.
Harvard University’s Personal Genetics Education Project
Coming out of the Wu Lab at Harvard Medical School, Dana Waring is in charge of the Personal Genetics Education Project. This website will be particularly useful when personal genome sequencing becomes widely available. To prepare yourself, learn about the possible benefits and risks as well as those who are currently involved in developing genetic sequencing technology.
Dana had this to say about the Personal Genetics Education Project:
The pgEd is about public education and engagement on personal genetics. I am a member of a basic research lab at Harvard Medical, but my area is the ELSI (ethics, legal, and social issues) side of personal genetics. I think we all believe that the widespread lowcost sequencing is coming soon, and that its really time to get ready!
Our project is aimed at education/outreach to high school and college students, curriculum development, but we are also hoping to engage some of the other stake holders (insurers!) on the topic. I really think that this technology is squared aimed at the generation who are 5-10 years away from being independent health care consumers.
World Health Organization’s The Genomic Resource Centre
A question from Kathy F about the accuracy of genetic tests got me wondering about general quality assurance issues. The WHO Genomic Resource Centre has a very detailed section on Quality & Safety in Genetic Testing: An Emerging Concern. According to the introduction, the WHO has been considering the implications of genetic testing on public health since 2003.
Here are three elements proposed by the WHO to determine the validity and utility of a genetic test:
-
Analytic validity refers to the ability of the laboratory test to distinguish the trait that it was designed to measure (in the case of genetic testing, the presence of an abnormal gene variant)
-
Clinical validity describes the test’s ability to predict a given clinical outcome.
-
Clinical utility indicates whether a test results in information that can be used to develop a clinical intervention.
Last year, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) reported to the Senate that home DNA tests are misleading, medically unproven, and/or ambiguous. But while a great attention has been focused on direct-to-consumer genetic testing, that doesn’t mean in-laboratory tests are necessarily always accurate and reliable. If you have any doubts or questions about genetic test results, never hesitate to ask for reassurance from your genetic counselor and/or the laboratory that performed the test. Don’t forget that you can always take the test again for confirmation just as you can always ask for a second opinion on any medical diagnosis!
Tags: genetics, genes, dna, genome, genomics, personal genetics

Related Posts:
Eye on DNA Headlines for 7 September 2007...
Biocomputers Made of DNA, RNA, and Proteins...
Connected to Eye on DNA...
DNA Quote: Dr. George Church...
DNA Quote: Steven Pinker...
Attend Genetics Meetings for Free...
Most Powerful Women in Biotechnology and Healthcare...
7 Comments
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
Search Eye on DNA
- Genetic Genealogy on Faces of America
- DNA Network Tweet Cloud
- DNA{wesome}
- Genetics = Real Science
- Larry David’s DNA Test
- Lopez Tonight First Late-Night Show to Offer DNA Testing
- American Genes Don’t Exist
- Knowledge about Genetic Risk is Power or is it Fear?
- Murderer Gets Reduced Sentence Because His Genes Made Him Do It
- Video: Knome’s Ari Kiirikki Speaks with Medgadget
MOST POPULAR
- DNA Toys: Ben 10 and Digimon Digivice
- 100 Facts About DNA
- Salaries for Jobs in Genetics
- Fetal Gender DNA Tests Answer Common Pregnancy Question...Or Not
- What does DNA mean to you?
- Eye on DNA Interview: Dr. Tzung-Fu Hsieh of RedTracer DNA Test for the Red Hair Gene, MC1R
- Books About DNA: The Crime of Reason by Robert B. Laughlin
- Genetically Modified Organisms Bring in the Cash
- Navigenics Introduces Physician Portal and Annual Insight Service
- Parenting Children Using Genetic Tests
- People Who’ve Had Their Genomes Sequenced
09/29/2009 07:03 am
8 Comments - Larry David’s DNA Test
11/17/2009 02:52 am
1 Comment - 23andMe DNA Tests for $399, Down From $999
09/10/2008 04:33 am
6 Comments - Crazy Genetic Marketing Ideas
07/05/2008 09:14 pm
7 Comments - Parenting Children Using Genetic Tests
05/18/2009 02:09 am
4 Comments - Business of DNA
- DNA @ Google Answers
- DNA and Disease
- DNA and Genealogy
- DNA and the Law
- DNA Around the World
- DNA Fun
- DNA in General
- DNA Inventions and Gadgets
- DNA Lab Talk
- DNA Podcasts and Videos
- DNA Quotes and Excerpts
- DNA Testing
- Gene Therapy
- Genetic Engineering
- Genetically Modified Foods and Organisms
- Jobs Involving DNA
- Personalities with DNA
- Polls About DNA
RECENT POSTS
RECENT COMMENTS
CATEGORIES
ARCHIVE
- January 2010
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
RANDOMIZED BLOGROLL
- Biotech Blog
- Omics! Omics!
- The Panda’s Thumb
- Bio Job Blog
- Evolution…Not “Just a Theory” Anymore
- Genomics Policy
- Genome Technology Online
- The Loom
- Yann Klimentidis’ Weblog
- Evolution Minute
| We comply with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information: verify here. |





That was interesting reading; thanks for posting. I remember now why I have good reason to believe the test was accurate: My 17 and 29 CAG counts matched with one of my mom’s, the 17. I did not inherit her 41, so must have got the 29 from my dad. Since we knew my mom’s CAG count, and knew one of mine had to match one of hers, it makes sense that the test was accurate, at least in that one gene.
I just wish we’d had my grandmother tested. She had a “mild” case of HD, in fact she lived to be 80. I suspect my mom’s gene may have been a mutation. But we’ll never know now.
It’s just survivor’s guilt that makes me wonder about things like mistakes in genetics tests!
Thanks for coming back and letting us know! I have been thinking about you since you left the last comment about your worries. *hugs*
Hsien,
Ms. Waring recently agreed to do an interview for The Genetic Genealogist, so if you or any of your readers have any questions about the Personal Genetics Education Project just let me know! It looks like a great project.
Thanks for this post! I’ve included it in the Medicine 2.0 Blog Carnival at The Health Wisdom Blog.
Thanks, Pat!
[...] this field. You can see a few recent mentions of the pgEd from other members of the DNA Network – EyeonDNA, and [...]
[...] Genealogist has an interview with Dana Waring of the Personal Genetics Education Project. (I wrote about the pgEd in [...]