US Military Discriminates Against Service Members With Genetic Diseases
by Dr. Hsien-Hsien Lei
Posted August 30, 2007 in DNA Testing, DNA in General, Jobs Involving DNA
Service members of the US Armed Forces may risk their lives for their country but if they’ve got a disease-causing genetic mutation, they are shown the door. Karen Kaplan at the LA Times writes on a disturbing US armed forces policy to deny benefits to servicemen and women who have congenital or hereditary conditions unless they’ve already served 8 years.
Kathy Hudson of the Genetics and Public Policy Center at Johns Hopkins University:
You could be in the military and be a six-pack-a-day smoker, and if you come down with emphysema, ‘That’s OK. We’ve got you covered. But if you happen to have a disease where there is an identified genetic contribution, you are screwed.
It’s an antiquated policy that was meant to prevent people from enlisting for health benefits knowing they would later develop a serious and/or life-threatening condition. Ironically, genetic discrimination against civilian employees in the federal government was banned in 2000. The same could happen to all insurance policy holders if the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2007 isn’t passed into law but even if it is, it won’t apply to military personnel.
To keep their military patients from being denied health benefits, doctors are now advising their patients to avoid genetic testing of all forms, including private testing. Dr. Mark Nunes, who headed the Air Force Genetics Center’s DNA diagnostic laboratory at Keesler Air Force Base in Mississippi:
If someone called me up with regard to genetic testing, I had to say, ‘That might not be something you want to pursue.”
You could get court-martialed if it were revealed that you had sought medical treatment or testing outside the system.
This is shocking and dismaying. How soon will it be before the US armed forces (or any other country) begin genetic screening of recruits? As if it’s not already hard enough to get qualified people to serve. Who would want to join the military knowing they may not get the benefits they deserve, especially health benefits which is undeniably one of the most important.
For more on genetic discrimination against job applicants, see my previous post – Want a job? Submit your DNA.
More on genetic discrimination in the military:
NB: The 81st Medical Group operating out of Keesler Air Force Base has the only medical genetics center in the Department of Defense.

Related Posts:
One Big Happy Family Genome...
Navigenics Introduces Physician Portal and Annual Insight Service...
What’s In Your DNA? #19...
DNA Passports for Canadians...
DNA Network Members Discuss Personal Genomics Service Providers 23andMe, deCODEme, and Navigenics...
Dr. Robert Marion on Complex Genetic Diseases...
Eye on DNA Headlines for 27 November 2007...
12 Comments
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
Search Eye on DNA
- Genetic Genealogy on Faces of America
- DNA Network Tweet Cloud
- DNA{wesome}
- Genetics = Real Science
- Larry David’s DNA Test
- Lopez Tonight First Late-Night Show to Offer DNA Testing
- American Genes Don’t Exist
- Knowledge about Genetic Risk is Power or is it Fear?
- Murderer Gets Reduced Sentence Because His Genes Made Him Do It
- Video: Knome’s Ari Kiirikki Speaks with Medgadget
MOST POPULAR
- DNA Toys: Ben 10 and Digimon Digivice
- 100 Facts About DNA
- What does DNA mean to you?
- Eye on DNA Interview: Dr. Tzung-Fu Hsieh of RedTracer DNA Test for the Red Hair Gene, MC1R
- Salaries for Jobs in Genetics
- Books About DNA: The Crime of Reason by Robert B. Laughlin
- Genetically Modified Organisms Bring in the Cash
- Navigenics Introduces Physician Portal and Annual Insight Service
- Parenting Children Using Genetic Tests
- American Clinical Laboratory Association Tips for Consumers of Genetic Tests
- Larry David’s DNA Test
11/17/2009 02:52 am
1 Comment - 23andMe DNA Tests for $399, Down From $999
09/10/2008 04:33 am
6 Comments - Crazy Genetic Marketing Ideas
07/05/2008 09:14 pm
7 Comments - Parenting Children Using Genetic Tests
05/18/2009 02:09 am
4 Comments - Just a Little Scared of Genetic Testing
10/01/2007 01:34 pm
11 Comments - Business of DNA
- DNA @ Google Answers
- DNA and Disease
- DNA and Genealogy
- DNA and the Law
- DNA Around the World
- DNA Fun
- DNA in General
- DNA Inventions and Gadgets
- DNA Lab Talk
- DNA Podcasts and Videos
- DNA Quotes and Excerpts
- DNA Testing
- Gene Therapy
- Genetic Engineering
- Genetically Modified Foods and Organisms
- Jobs Involving DNA
- Personalities with DNA
- Polls About DNA
RECENT POSTS
RECENT COMMENTS
CATEGORIES
ARCHIVE
- January 2010
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
RANDOMIZED BLOGROLL
- OMMBID Blog
- The Personal Genome
- Highlight HEALTH
- The Biotech Weblog
- The Panda’s Thumb
- The Daily Transcript
- nodalpoint.org
- Evolution Minute
- ScienceRoll
- Emergiblog
| We comply with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information: verify here. |




Is this still part of that “perfect soldier” myth? sheesh, when would the militiary ever grow up?
In this case, jhay, it probably has more to do with the bottom line – money.
You miss the idea behind the Army’s policy: They’re not responsible. As much sympathy as you have for people with these problems, we’re kind of losing our ability to reason unemotionally. People shouldn’t have to pay for that which they’re not responsible. If you want to help, that’s another thing.
Hi Nelson. Thanks for the comment. Unfortunately, I didn’t miss the idea behind their policy. Of course they want to dodge responsibility and costs wherever they can but why should genetic predisposition be different from other behaviors that increase a person’s risk of disease? If, by your logic, the military doesn’t have to pay for what’s not their responsibility then I guess the only kind of benefits they are obligated to offer to service members are those directly related to combat or active duty?
If a soldier smokes, drinks too much alcohol, eats too much fatty food, should s/he he be denied medical coverage as well? Genetic risk factors are like other risk factors in many ways. There’s nothing more sinister about a disease that can be attributed to genes. In fact, almost all disease have a genetic component. How does the military plan to keep track of that? Genetic screening of servicemen and women can’t be too far away.
Actually, the Army (I’m in the Army) does only pay for injuries incurred during service. We should help people. That’s not my point. I just think to call people irresponsible for ignoring things for which they’re not responsible is not a good way to conduct business.
We also need a little common sense. Lot’s of things have genetic components, like you said, but, like everything in life, we need to find a place where we can draw a line.
It seems easy to hold large entities responsible because it’s just a little more money. But think of that principal applied personally. Do you want to be held liable for your web designer’s (nice job, by the way) carpal tunnel or eyesight because he has exceptionally weak cartilage or especially sensittive eyes?
Nelson, Thanks for the info. Obviously I don’t know too much about what benefits the military provides but I’m shocked that all-purpose health insurance isn’t available. (I’ve emailed a friend of mine whose husband is a doctor in the Air Force stationed in Italy to ask for clarification.)
As for the web designer’s health problems, if I were to hire one full-time as an employee, I would certainly provide adequate health insurance to ensure the s/eh would get the care needed.
Thank you for posting this story. Aside from the fact that the policy is legally and scientifically inconsistent and unfair on many levels, it remains appalling mostly because these soldiers are willing to sacrifice so much of themselves in service. Having served a bit of time with Uncle Sam’s Misguided Children (USMC) as a Navy Corpsman, I can understand the cold hearted logic of the policy (exclude freeloaders looking for benefits for a pre-existing condition), but this does not jibe with the current situation. With so many troops rotating through hostile areas – who can really be considered a freeloader ? These service people have EARNED and are deserving of much better treatment.
Thanks for the input, origins g. I certainly agree that if employees have dedicated their lives to a company, they deserve to get adequate benefits – health insurance, pensions, and otherwise. Not saying that all companies do right by their staff but they should. The US military is an employer and service people their employees. It’s as simple as that. What’s worse, they’re sending their employees “into harm’s way” so what the heck with not providing them basic health insurance?!
Let me clarify. I’m not saying anybody is a freeloader or that we shouldn’t help people or even that the policy shouldn’t be changed (unless they knew and didn’t report it). I guess it’s mostly an ideological stance: That people should only be forced, legally, to pay for those things for which they’re responsible.
I understand, Nelson. It’s just really hard to figure who’s responsible. That’s what insurance is supposed to be for!
What is the rule on having Bipolar Disorder and joining the military?
Hi Chris,
I found this answer on the Army National Guard forum:
3. One was diagnosed as bipolar as a child, but is no longer on any medication or specific treatment for it. Will this affect his ability to join?
Normally this done on a case by case basis. The prospective applicant would gather all of the pertinent documents from their doctor and submit a medical pre-evaluation (which is done through a recruiter). The Chief Medical Officer will review the documents and make a determination from the facts(i.e. Medical Documents) that are available at his disposal.