<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: US Military Discriminates Against Service Members With Genetic Diseases</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.eyeondna.com/2007/08/30/us-military-discriminates-against-service-members-with-genetic-diseases/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.eyeondna.com/2007/08/30/us-military-discriminates-against-service-members-with-genetic-diseases/</link>
	<description>How will it change your life?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 18:52:38 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hsien-Hsien Lei, PhD</title>
		<link>http://www.eyeondna.com/2007/08/30/us-military-discriminates-against-service-members-with-genetic-diseases/comment-page-1/#comment-34943</link>
		<dc:creator>Hsien-Hsien Lei, PhD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 12:24:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeondna.com/2007/08/30/us-armed-forces-discriminates-against-service-members-with-genetic-diseases/#comment-34943</guid>
		<description>Hi Chris, 

I found this answer on the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.1800goguard.com/forums/archive/index.php/t-121.html&quot;&gt;Army National Guard forum&lt;/a&gt;:

&lt;i&gt;3. One was diagnosed as bipolar as a child, but is no longer on any medication or specific treatment for it. Will this affect his ability to join? 

Normally this done on a case by case basis. The prospective applicant would gather all of the pertinent documents from their doctor and submit a medical pre-evaluation (which is done through a recruiter). The Chief Medical Officer will review the documents and make a determination from the facts(i.e. Medical Documents) that are available at his disposal. &lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Chris, </p>
<p>I found this answer on the <a href="http://www.1800goguard.com/forums/archive/index.php/t-121.html">Army National Guard forum</a>:</p>
<p><i>3. One was diagnosed as bipolar as a child, but is no longer on any medication or specific treatment for it. Will this affect his ability to join? </p>
<p>Normally this done on a case by case basis. The prospective applicant would gather all of the pertinent documents from their doctor and submit a medical pre-evaluation (which is done through a recruiter). The Chief Medical Officer will review the documents and make a determination from the facts(i.e. Medical Documents) that are available at his disposal. </i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://www.eyeondna.com/2007/08/30/us-military-discriminates-against-service-members-with-genetic-diseases/comment-page-1/#comment-34769</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 20:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeondna.com/2007/08/30/us-armed-forces-discriminates-against-service-members-with-genetic-diseases/#comment-34769</guid>
		<description>What is the rule on having Bipolar Disorder and joining the military?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the rule on having Bipolar Disorder and joining the military?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hsien</title>
		<link>http://www.eyeondna.com/2007/08/30/us-military-discriminates-against-service-members-with-genetic-diseases/comment-page-1/#comment-6240</link>
		<dc:creator>Hsien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 15:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeondna.com/2007/08/30/us-armed-forces-discriminates-against-service-members-with-genetic-diseases/#comment-6240</guid>
		<description>I understand, Nelson. It&#039;s just really hard to figure who&#039;s responsible. That&#039;s what insurance is supposed to be for!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand, Nelson. It&#8217;s just really hard to figure who&#8217;s responsible. That&#8217;s what insurance is supposed to be for!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nelson Guirado</title>
		<link>http://www.eyeondna.com/2007/08/30/us-military-discriminates-against-service-members-with-genetic-diseases/comment-page-1/#comment-6160</link>
		<dc:creator>Nelson Guirado</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 21:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeondna.com/2007/08/30/us-armed-forces-discriminates-against-service-members-with-genetic-diseases/#comment-6160</guid>
		<description>Let me clarify. I&#039;m not saying anybody is a freeloader or that we shouldn&#039;t help people or even that the policy shouldn&#039;t be changed (unless they knew and didn&#039;t report it). I guess it&#039;s mostly an ideological stance: That people should only be forced, legally, to pay for those things for which they&#039;re responsible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me clarify. I&#8217;m not saying anybody is a freeloader or that we shouldn&#8217;t help people or even that the policy shouldn&#8217;t be changed (unless they knew and didn&#8217;t report it). I guess it&#8217;s mostly an ideological stance: That people should only be forced, legally, to pay for those things for which they&#8217;re responsible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hsien</title>
		<link>http://www.eyeondna.com/2007/08/30/us-military-discriminates-against-service-members-with-genetic-diseases/comment-page-1/#comment-6121</link>
		<dc:creator>Hsien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 16:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeondna.com/2007/08/30/us-armed-forces-discriminates-against-service-members-with-genetic-diseases/#comment-6121</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the input, origins g. I certainly agree that if employees have dedicated their lives to a company, they deserve to get adequate benefits - health insurance, pensions, and otherwise. Not saying that all companies do right by their staff but they should. The US military is an employer and service people their employees. It&#039;s as simple as that. What&#039;s worse, they&#039;re sending their employees &quot;into harm&#039;s way&quot; so what the heck with not providing them basic health insurance?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the input, origins g. I certainly agree that if employees have dedicated their lives to a company, they deserve to get adequate benefits &#8211; health insurance, pensions, and otherwise. Not saying that all companies do right by their staff but they should. The US military is an employer and service people their employees. It&#8217;s as simple as that. What&#8217;s worse, they&#8217;re sending their employees &#8220;into harm&#8217;s way&#8221; so what the heck with not providing them basic health insurance?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hsien</title>
		<link>http://www.eyeondna.com/2007/08/30/us-military-discriminates-against-service-members-with-genetic-diseases/comment-page-1/#comment-6120</link>
		<dc:creator>Hsien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 15:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeondna.com/2007/08/30/us-armed-forces-discriminates-against-service-members-with-genetic-diseases/#comment-6120</guid>
		<description>Nelson, Thanks for the info. Obviously I don&#039;t know too much about what benefits the military provides but I&#039;m shocked that all-purpose health insurance isn&#039;t available. (I&#039;ve emailed a friend of mine whose husband is a doctor in the Air Force stationed in Italy to ask for clarification.)

As for the web designer&#039;s health problems, if I were to hire one full-time as an employee, I would certainly provide adequate health insurance to ensure the s/eh would get the care needed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nelson, Thanks for the info. Obviously I don&#8217;t know too much about what benefits the military provides but I&#8217;m shocked that all-purpose health insurance isn&#8217;t available. (I&#8217;ve emailed a friend of mine whose husband is a doctor in the Air Force stationed in Italy to ask for clarification.)</p>
<p>As for the web designer&#8217;s health problems, if I were to hire one full-time as an employee, I would certainly provide adequate health insurance to ensure the s/eh would get the care needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: origins g</title>
		<link>http://www.eyeondna.com/2007/08/30/us-military-discriminates-against-service-members-with-genetic-diseases/comment-page-1/#comment-6109</link>
		<dc:creator>origins g</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 15:41:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeondna.com/2007/08/30/us-armed-forces-discriminates-against-service-members-with-genetic-diseases/#comment-6109</guid>
		<description>Thank you for posting this story.  Aside from the fact that the policy is legally and scientifically inconsistent and unfair on many levels, it remains appalling mostly because these soldiers are willing to sacrifice so much of themselves in service.  Having served a bit of time with Uncle Sam&#039;s Misguided Children (USMC) as a Navy Corpsman, I can understand the cold hearted logic of the policy (exclude freeloaders looking for benefits for a pre-existing condition), but this does not jibe with the current situation.  With so many troops rotating through hostile areas - who can really be considered a freeloader ?  These service people have EARNED and are deserving of much better treatment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for posting this story.  Aside from the fact that the policy is legally and scientifically inconsistent and unfair on many levels, it remains appalling mostly because these soldiers are willing to sacrifice so much of themselves in service.  Having served a bit of time with Uncle Sam&#8217;s Misguided Children (USMC) as a Navy Corpsman, I can understand the cold hearted logic of the policy (exclude freeloaders looking for benefits for a pre-existing condition), but this does not jibe with the current situation.  With so many troops rotating through hostile areas &#8211; who can really be considered a freeloader ?  These service people have EARNED and are deserving of much better treatment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nelson Guirado</title>
		<link>http://www.eyeondna.com/2007/08/30/us-military-discriminates-against-service-members-with-genetic-diseases/comment-page-1/#comment-6107</link>
		<dc:creator>Nelson Guirado</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 14:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeondna.com/2007/08/30/us-armed-forces-discriminates-against-service-members-with-genetic-diseases/#comment-6107</guid>
		<description>Actually, the Army (I&#039;m in the Army) does only pay for injuries incurred during service. We should help people. That&#039;s not my point. I just think to call people irresponsible for ignoring things for which they&#039;re not responsible is not a good way to conduct business. 

We also need a little common sense. Lot&#039;s of things have genetic components, like you said, but, like everything in life, we need to find a place where we can draw a line. 

It seems easy to hold large entities responsible because it&#039;s just a little more money. But think of that principal applied personally. Do you want to be held liable for your web designer&#039;s (nice job, by the way) carpal tunnel or eyesight because he has exceptionally weak cartilage or especially sensittive eyes?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, the Army (I&#8217;m in the Army) does only pay for injuries incurred during service. We should help people. That&#8217;s not my point. I just think to call people irresponsible for ignoring things for which they&#8217;re not responsible is not a good way to conduct business. </p>
<p>We also need a little common sense. Lot&#8217;s of things have genetic components, like you said, but, like everything in life, we need to find a place where we can draw a line. </p>
<p>It seems easy to hold large entities responsible because it&#8217;s just a little more money. But think of that principal applied personally. Do you want to be held liable for your web designer&#8217;s (nice job, by the way) carpal tunnel or eyesight because he has exceptionally weak cartilage or especially sensittive eyes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hsien</title>
		<link>http://www.eyeondna.com/2007/08/30/us-military-discriminates-against-service-members-with-genetic-diseases/comment-page-1/#comment-6080</link>
		<dc:creator>Hsien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 11:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeondna.com/2007/08/30/us-armed-forces-discriminates-against-service-members-with-genetic-diseases/#comment-6080</guid>
		<description>Hi Nelson. Thanks for the comment. Unfortunately, I didn&#039;t miss the idea behind their policy. Of course they want to dodge responsibility and costs wherever they can but why should genetic predisposition be different from other behaviors that increase a person&#039;s risk of disease? If, by your logic, the military doesn&#039;t have to pay for what&#039;s not their responsibility then I guess the only kind of benefits they are obligated to offer to service members are those directly related to combat or active duty? 

If a soldier smokes, drinks too much alcohol, eats too much fatty food, should s/he he be denied medical coverage as well? Genetic risk factors are like other risk factors in many ways. There&#039;s nothing more sinister about a disease that can be attributed to genes. In fact, almost all disease have a genetic component. How does the military plan to keep track of that? Genetic screening of servicemen and women can&#039;t be too far away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Nelson. Thanks for the comment. Unfortunately, I didn&#8217;t miss the idea behind their policy. Of course they want to dodge responsibility and costs wherever they can but why should genetic predisposition be different from other behaviors that increase a person&#8217;s risk of disease? If, by your logic, the military doesn&#8217;t have to pay for what&#8217;s not their responsibility then I guess the only kind of benefits they are obligated to offer to service members are those directly related to combat or active duty? </p>
<p>If a soldier smokes, drinks too much alcohol, eats too much fatty food, should s/he he be denied medical coverage as well? Genetic risk factors are like other risk factors in many ways. There&#8217;s nothing more sinister about a disease that can be attributed to genes. In fact, almost all disease have a genetic component. How does the military plan to keep track of that? Genetic screening of servicemen and women can&#8217;t be too far away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nelson Guirado</title>
		<link>http://www.eyeondna.com/2007/08/30/us-military-discriminates-against-service-members-with-genetic-diseases/comment-page-1/#comment-6000</link>
		<dc:creator>Nelson Guirado</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 22:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeondna.com/2007/08/30/us-armed-forces-discriminates-against-service-members-with-genetic-diseases/#comment-6000</guid>
		<description>You miss the idea behind the Army&#039;s policy: They&#039;re not responsible. As much sympathy as you have for people with these problems, we&#039;re kind of losing our ability to reason unemotionally. People shouldn&#039;t have to pay for that which they&#039;re not responsible. If you want to help, that&#039;s another thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You miss the idea behind the Army&#8217;s policy: They&#8217;re not responsible. As much sympathy as you have for people with these problems, we&#8217;re kind of losing our ability to reason unemotionally. People shouldn&#8217;t have to pay for that which they&#8217;re not responsible. If you want to help, that&#8217;s another thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
