Genetics of Bipolar Disorder and Hypomania

Genetics of Bipolar Disorder and Hypomania

by Dr. Hsien-Hsien Lei
Posted October 11, 2007 in DNA and Disease

alicia sparksMental Health Notes writer Alicia Sparks, who also has bipolar disorder, celebrated her 26th birthday this week and received this card from her sister:

(COVER)

Sis,
insanity is hereditary.

(Inside)

We are so screwed.

Anyway, Happy Birthday.

(It’s ok to laugh. Alicia did.) And of course, Alicia and her sister are right.

In Bipolar Disorder: In the Genes? Tina Benitez of FOX News covers the current state of understanding with the following facts:

  • Identical twins have a 70 percent higher chance of developing bipolar disorder.
  • If one parent is bipolar, there is a 7 to 10 percent higher risk of getting bipolar disorder.
  • If there are two parents, there is a 20 percent chance of developing bipolar in the offspring because of the multiple genes.

The Slynar, FAT, and P2RX7 genes are the only three genes thus far to be associated with bipolar disorder.

On a related note, similar to the mania phase of bipolar illness, a person experiencing hypomania is overflowing with energy, ebullience, and excitement. Hypomanic people often accomplish great things and are persuasive leaders. Dr. John Gartner, assistant professor of psychiatry at Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, claims in The Hypomanic Edge that a higher than expected number of Americans are hypomanic, which may be explained by genetics.

America is the land of immigrants and studies have shown that the prevalence of bipolar disorder is higher among this population. In turn, the descendents of these immigrants have a higher risk of hypomania. People affected by bipolar disorder or hypomania may be more willing to risk leaving their home country for a strange, foreign land because they feel invincibile while in their heightened state.

Dr. Kay Redfield Jamison agrees in her book, Exuberance,

Individuals who sought the new, who took risks that others would not, or who rebelled against repressive social systems may have been more likely to immigrate to America and, once there, to succeed.

So perhaps Alicia has a family history of incredible accomplishments but as far as I can tell, she’s done pretty well herself.

Tags: , , , , ,


goldfade-divider-custom.gif

Related Posts:
Eye on DNA Links for 6 July 2007...
Genetic Testing for Psychiatric Diseases...
Want a job? Submit your DNA...
The Genetics of Sexual Development...
Eye on DNA Headlines for 12 August 2007...
Genetic Testing to Prevent Wrongful Life...
Evil Genes by Barbara Oakley (and why I’ll never write a book)...

RSS feed | Trackback URI

Please note that comments left using the form below will be publicly displayed. If you'd like to correspond with me privately, please email me at hsien@eyeondna.com.

If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it's probably in moderation. I will approve it as soon as I can! Thanks for your patience.

8 Comments »

Comment by Andro Hsu Subscribed to comments via email

Hi Hsien,

I’ve been reading The Tiger That Isn’t, a book about innumeracy (the numerical version of illiteracy). It’s sort of an updated version of the classic How To Lie With Statistics, but with an eye toward the mainstream media (MSM) and public policy.

In the chapter on risk, the authors point out that the MSM often reports increases in risk as “70% higher” without reporting the baseline or average risk. They suggest that skeptical (or just honest) readers should ask, “70% compared to what?”

The NIMH reports that the adult prevalence of bipolar disorder is 2.6%. So the authors of Tiger would suggest that MSM reports read more like the following:

“The average American has a 2.6% chance of having bipolar disorder. Siblings with an identical twin who has bipolar disorder have a 4.4% chance. People who have one parent with bipolar disorder have a 2.8-2.9% chance of becoming bipolar, while those with two bipolar parents have a 3.1% chance.”

Why does the MSM like to report it the first way? Simply because normalizing against the average risk makes bigger numbers and sells more papers/airtime/adclicks! A “20% increase” sounds much more serious than having a 3.1% chance compared to a 2.6% chance, even though they mean exactly the same thing.

Reporting the baseline risk is important because it underscores the fact that even though there may be a genetic component to conditions like bipolar disorder, genetics are not deterministic for many of the most common diseases.

Andro

Thanks for making that great point, Andro. It would be a perfect blog post! When are you going to get that going? ;)

 
 

[...] Lei gave me and bipolar disorder an awesome shout out today at her fabulous blog Eye on DNA: Genetics of Bipolar Disorder and Hypomania. (Is “shout out” the appropriate term to use when one refers to information about and [...]

 
Comment by alicia Subscribed to comments via email

Hsien: You make me blush.

Right before the event that led to my finally seeing a professional, and eventually getting diagnosed, I was hypomanic for…geez…well, a long time. Severely, then not-so-severely, then manic, then hypo again. I was mostly hypo for years. It was…well, at the time it was wonderful. I worked 2 jobs (one was my actual full-time career, the other was a job I picked up in college and just couldn’t give up?!), 6 or 7 days/nights a week, slept 2-3 hours a night/morning, and managed to have a…very “interesting” social life. I felt like everything I touched turned to gold, because everything was so successful. Of course, I was on the eve of mania, then crashing, then total disaster.

I’m now stuck in knowing how good it can be, how bad it can turn, and not knowing how to get back to it even if I knew how to balance it.

But, I’m getting off on a tangent.

Ah, I can’t wait to dig into these links! Thank you so much!

Andro: Excellent observation.

Alicia, You rock! I’m so impressed at how well you’re handling everything. I definitely think you’re on to greater and greater successes.

 
 

[...] NB: Andro Hsu of 23andMe has made a similar point in the past about presenting risk information. [...]

 
Comment by Kaila Colbin Subscribed to comments via email

Hi there,

In light of Andro’s observation, may I ask whether the ‘20 percent chance’ from two bipolar parents is a hard number or whether it is 20% higher?

Cheers,
Kaila

 

[...] October, Dr. Hsien-Hsien Lei of Eye On DNA highlighted information regarding bipolar disorder and genetics (and published a picture of me wearing the exact tee shirt I’m wearing right now - funny, [...]

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Update 5 Jan 09: I'm back from maternity leave!


Search Eye on DNA


Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


ARCHIVE


RANDOMIZED BLOGROLL


We comply with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health
information:
verify here.
Eye on DNA is not a substitute for medical advice. Always ask your healthcare provider or genetic counselor for information specific to you.

Mendel's Garden

Healthcare 100 - eDrugSearch.com



View Hsien-Hsien Lei, PhD's profile on LinkedIn

Bloggers' Rights at EFF