How to Clean DNA Off a Knife
by Dr. Hsien-Hsien Lei
Posted November 21, 2007 in DNA and the Law
As most of us are now aware from many episodes of CSI, you can get DNA off of most anything. Because this is the case, if you’re contemplating a crime, you should think twice. Chances are, DNA can catch a thief. And a murderer.
Three suspects accused of murdering British exchange student Meredith Kercher in Italy thought they’d gotten rid of the evidence by cleaning the alleged murder weapon, a kitchen knife, with bleach. But it wasn’t good enough. DNA could still be recovered from the tip and handle of the knife.
Juliet Lapidos, Slate’s Explainer, says bleach is very effective at destroying DNA but you have to be very thorough.
So, why did Knox and Sollecito’s bleaching gambit fail? It’s difficult to swab a knife thoroughly. Dried blood can stick to the nooks and crannies in a wood handle, to the serrated edge of a blade, or become lodged in the slit between the blade and the hilt. With help from a Q-tip, it’s possible to eliminate most stains, but what’s not visible to the naked eye might still be visible to a microscope, and sophisticated crime labs need only about 10 cells to build a DNA profile.
DNA specialist Dr. Karen Rudolph has been able to extract one speck of dried blood from the hinge of a folding knife that had been boiled. The suspect was later convicted.
This all begs the question: Why don’t the suspects destroy the murder weapons rather than cleaning them? If there’s enough time to bleach and boil, surely there’s enough time to find a way to dispose of the knife. Not that I would know, of course!
Tags: genetics, genes, dna, crime, murder, amanda knox, meredith kercher, raphael sollecito, knives

Related Posts:
DNA in Wildlife Investigations...
Eye On DNA Down...
Eye on DNA Interview: Terry Carmichael, VP of Marketing & Sales at Consumer Genetics...
Please note that comments left using the form below will be publicly displayed. If you'd like to correspond with me privately, please email me at hsien@eyeondna.com.
If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it's probably in moderation. I will approve it as soon as I can! Thanks for your patience.
10 Comments »
Update 5 Jan 09: I'm back from maternity leave!
Search Eye on DNA
- Eye on DNA Links for 9 January 2009
- Testing Children for Sporting Ability Genes
- State Laws Governing Genetic Discrimination
- Ambiguous Results from Genetic Testing
- Outrageous DNA Predictions for 2009
- Happy New Year 2009!
- The DNA Network Technical Issues
- ScienceBlogs Biotech Blog
- Consumer Genetics Show 2009 in Boston
- Rule of Thumb on Speeches About Science
MOST POPULAR
- DNA Toys: Ben 10 and Digimon Digivice
- 100 Facts About DNA
- Salaries for Jobs in Genetics
- Want a job? Submit your DNA
- What does DNA mean to you? #14
- 5 Cool Things You Can Do With Your DNA
- What does DNA mean to you? #11
- What does DNA mean to you? #10
- DNA Video: DNA Replication by The Backrow
- DNA Excerpt: Bringing Home the Birkin
- Eye on DNA Links for 9 January 2009
01/09/2009 07:51 am
1 Comment - Testing Children for Sporting Ability Genes
01/09/2009 06:38 am
2 Comments - State Laws Governing Genetic Discrimination
01/09/2009 05:35 am
5 Comments - Singapore Company DNA Dynasty Will (Not) Tell Your Children’s Future
01/08/2009 11:25 pm
11 Comments - Weird Use of DNA #482: Ancient DNA in Painting
01/06/2009 03:16 am
2 Comments - Business of DNA
- DNA @ Google Answers
- DNA and Disease
- DNA and Genealogy
- DNA and the Law
- DNA Around the World
- DNA Fun
- DNA in General
- DNA Inventions and Gadgets
- DNA Lab Talk
- DNA Podcasts and Videos
- DNA Quotes and Excerpts
- DNA Testing
- Gene Therapy
- Genetic Engineering
- Genetically Modified Foods and Organisms
- Jobs Involving DNA
- Personalities with DNA
- Polls About DNA
RECENT POSTS
RECENT COMMENTS
CATEGORIES
ARCHIVE
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
RANDOMIZED BLOGROLL
- Sandwalk
- A Blog Around The Clock
- The Loom
- The Minnesota Gene Pool
- Six Impossible Things Before Breakfast
- Genetizen
- nodalpoint.org
- The Personal Genome
- The Haversian Canal
- Let’s Get Personal
| We comply with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information: verify here. |





I’m a big fan of presuming innocence until an individual is proven guilty in a court of law.
Hmmm…maybe I’m missing something, but is it really so surprising that the DNA of two people that live together is found on a kitchen knife in their apartment? Just a guess, but I bet my DNA is on a lot of kitchen knives in my home.
Matt, I have no idea if those three people involved in the Italian murder case are truly guilty. The media, of course, is painting them as such….
Maybe they should’ve used boiling bleach and then some scalding hot aqua regia, that would not only have done for the DNA on the knife but the fumes would’ve done for them too.
db
David, I was thinking the same!
Bleach ? What about Hydrogen peroxide? I believe H3O is the professional way to remove blood from just about everything.
Matt, unlike CSI, offenders do not break down and admit everything as soon as the most tenuous of evidence is presented in front of them. It’s fair to say that DNA left legitimately is going to be less valuable evidentially (but enough for the media to sensationalise) in court and isn’t going to break the case.
But if DNA from both suspect and victim are on the knife, one is Celluar DNA (from touching, handling) and the other DNA from a blood stain, then it puts a different slant on things.( I don’t actually know if this the case with regards this incident but you get the idea).
Regards
I do not think that the case against Amanda Knox and her boyfriend is strong enough yet. The knife could have been brought from her boyfriend’s home to her home by her, and then was used in the murder and washed by someone else, and then was brought back to her boyfriend’s home by her again. As to the surveillance video showing her coming back to her home in light clothing, it can explained away by pointing out that the video might have failed to record her leaving the house in dark clothing soon afterward, before the murder occurred.
The only thing that is difficult to explain is the fact that she changed her stories and they bought bleach to clean the house the day after the murder occurred.
That’s why those criminals get caught. They don’t think things through. If they really gave it a thorough thought, they could’ve chosen not to do the crime from the beginning because they are well aware of how sophisticated the real CSI could be.
if you were really smart you would have the bleach bought way ahead of time so that they cannot trace the “pure coincidence” of it being bought very close to the murder. When cleaning the knife wear THICK THICK rubber gloves so as to not get your finger prints on again. Dont wash just once. Wash once as through as you can and let it soak in the bleach for a few hours and then wash again. Sure it might rust but its better then being in jail right? There are other more effective chemicals than bleach tho but you would need some real connections to get those and they wouldnt damage the knife…just the dna
use H3O hydrogen peroxide.