23andMe Collaborates on Study of Parkinson’s Disease Genetics
by Dr. Hsien-Hsien Lei
Posted May 15, 2008 in DNA and Disease
Researchers are rarely study participants. Up until last week, I’d only had a hand in designing and conducting epidemiologic studies and no experience at all participating in one. While waiting for my prenatal check-up, a master’s degree student at Imperial College recruited me for her thesis study on stress and comorbidity in pregnant women. I was happy to help out since I know firsthand how hard recruiting can be especially since she told me she’d had to reduce her sample size from 200 to 100 because it was such tough going.
All I had to do was check the boxes on about 10 pages of questions and collect a total of six saliva samples over two days. Two samples are taken upon waking and another around 9 pm. I’m sorry to say that on the first day, I forgot that I was supposed to sit still while the cotton plug was under my tongue for two minutes absorbing saliva and I also forgot to take my night-time sample at 9 and did it at 10:30 instead. I was also supposed to mail my frozen samples in by regular mail this past Monday or Tuesday but got distracted so it will have to wait until next week.
What a lousy study participant I am especially given that I know what it’s like to be on the other side!
Perhaps 23andMe and the Parkinson’s Institute and Clinical Center will have more compliant study participants. They are planning a Web-based study of Parkinson’s disease that will ask 150 people to donate their saliva for genetic analysis like any 23andMe customer as well as submit personal data via the Web. In addition, the study will validate the online data collection method with face-to-face or phone interviews.
The San Francisco Chronicle reports that 23andMe also hopes that pharmaceutical companies will pay them for access to personal genomics customers who have specific conditions or disorders. Linda Avey is quoted as saying the pharmaceutical companies would be contacting customers to offer them the opportunity to participate in clinical trials (where 23andMe may also be able to offer database services) but I can easily see this extending into personalized ads for personalized medicine. Could be both good and bad.
From my recent and previous personal experiences, interviewer-led data collection will always be the gold standard because participants can ask for clarification on sample collection instructions and questions. However,
being able to complete questionnaires in the comfort of one’s own home without time pressure (I was in a rush in case I was called in for my appointment), may increase the accuracy of the data being collected. The 23andMe Parkinson’s disease study will be valuable not only for its potential genetic discoveries, but also for its insights into the implementation of the Web in scientific research. Unfortunately, there’s no easy way for me to spit my sample into them series of Internets tubes so I guess I’ll still have to remember to schlep them to the mailbox on Monday.
Photo credit: David Wilmot on Flickr

Related Posts:
23andMe DNA Tests for $399, Down From $999...
DNA Quote of the Day - Martin Varsavsky and 23andMe...
DNA Video: 23andMe Genetics 101 Part 4...
DNA Video: 23andMe Genetics 101 Part 3...
Eye on DNA Headlines for 23 March 2008...
DNA Video: 23andMe Genetics 101 Part 2...
My Son, The Genetic Epidemiologist...
Please note that comments left using the form below will be publicly displayed. If you'd like to correspond with me privately, please email me at hsien@eyeondna.com.
If your comment doesn't show up immediately, it's probably in moderation. I will approve it as soon as I can! Thanks for your patience.
2 Comments »
Note: Posting will be sporadic while I'm on maternity leave.
Search Eye on DNA
- Consumer Genetics Show 2009 in Boston
- Rule of Thumb on Speeches About Science
- Analysts Say deCODE Genetics Headed for Bankruptcy Court
- Genetically Engineered HTC Touch Diamond Phone
- Putting Your DNA To Use In Bad Economic Times
- Singapore Company DNA Dynasty Will (Not) Tell Your Children’s Future
- Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD): A Discussion
- Family History of Disease Scares Parents More Than Genetic Test Results
- How Many Ways Can A Physician Be Sued (Over Genetic Tests)?
- Server Issues
MOST POPULAR
- DNA Toys: Ben 10 and Digimon Digivice
- 100 Facts About DNA
- Salaries for Jobs in Genetics
- Want a job? Submit your DNA
- What does DNA mean to you? #14
- What does DNA mean to you? #11
- 5 Cool Things You Can Do With Your DNA
- What does DNA mean to you? #10
- DNA Excerpt: Bringing Home the Birkin
- DNA Video: DNA Replication by The Backrow
- Rule of Thumb on Speeches About Science
11/26/2008 07:15 pm
1 Comment - Singapore Company DNA Dynasty Will (Not) Tell Your Children’s Future
11/24/2008 02:08 am
2 Comments - Analysts Say deCODE Genetics Headed for Bankruptcy Court
11/23/2008 07:34 pm
2 Comments - Singapore Biotech Sector Loses Stem Cell Researcher Alan Colman
11/22/2008 11:59 am
6 Comments - Gene Genie #18 with the PG Tips Chimp
10/23/2007 09:28 am
38 Comments - Business of DNA
- DNA @ Google Answers
- DNA and Disease
- DNA and Genealogy
- DNA and the Law
- DNA Around the World
- DNA Fun
- DNA in General
- DNA Inventions and Gadgets
- DNA Lab Talk
- DNA Podcasts and Videos
- DNA Quotes and Excerpts
- DNA Testing
- Gene Therapy
- Genetic Engineering
- Genetically Modified Foods and Organisms
- Jobs Involving DNA
- Personalities with DNA
- Polls About DNA
RECENT POSTS
RECENT COMMENTS
CATEGORIES
ARCHIVE
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
RANDOMIZED BLOGROLL
- Gene Expression
- Gene Sherpa
- Epigenetics News
- Highlight HEALTH
- The Issue
- Behavioral Ecology Blog
- HealthNex
- Mark’s Daily Apple
- Tales of CFS
- Herpes Blog
| We comply with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information: verify here. |





Good post! Regarding: “Researchers are rarely study participants.” - I’m not so sure; the history of medical research, after all, would be dramatically different without a long tradition of autoexperimentation. See: Altman LK. Who goes first? The story of self-experimentation in medicine. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998.
Thanks for the comment, Jere! Good point. I was thinking more of population-based studies. In fact, I wonder if researchers should recuse themselves from participating because they over think the whole process of being a study participant! I know I am always looking for wording issues, etc. on the questionnaires.