<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: deCODE Genetics Sinking Low</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.eyeondna.com/2008/10/20/decode-genetics-sinking-low/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.eyeondna.com/2008/10/20/decode-genetics-sinking-low/</link>
	<description>How will it change your life?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 18:52:38 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gene Genie #39: Personal genomics and</title>
		<link>http://www.eyeondna.com/2008/10/20/decode-genetics-sinking-low/comment-page-1/#comment-59525</link>
		<dc:creator>Gene Genie #39: Personal genomics and</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 05:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeondna.com/2008/10/20/decode-genetics-sinking-low/#comment-59525</guid>
		<description>[...] financial troubles of deCODE Genetics continue to grow following the massive layout last March. Eye on DNA&#160;touches on the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] financial troubles of deCODE Genetics continue to grow following the massive layout last March. Eye on DNA&#160;touches on the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Misha</title>
		<link>http://www.eyeondna.com/2008/10/20/decode-genetics-sinking-low/comment-page-1/#comment-59516</link>
		<dc:creator>Misha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 13:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeondna.com/2008/10/20/decode-genetics-sinking-low/#comment-59516</guid>
		<description>Hi Hsien:

I&#039;m not sure selling out to Big Pharma is such a bad thing. I would imagine it&#039;s what many of these companies have hoped for all along, albeit at a much higher price...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Hsien:</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure selling out to Big Pharma is such a bad thing. I would imagine it&#8217;s what many of these companies have hoped for all along, albeit at a much higher price&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DNA MAN</title>
		<link>http://www.eyeondna.com/2008/10/20/decode-genetics-sinking-low/comment-page-1/#comment-59508</link>
		<dc:creator>DNA MAN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 17:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeondna.com/2008/10/20/decode-genetics-sinking-low/#comment-59508</guid>
		<description>In response to the posting: deCODE Genetics Sinking Low , I have the following comments. Almost everyone now realizes that the way to limit medical costs is to increase preventive measures. Of the over two trillion dollars a year we spend on health care, about 75% goes toward chronic diseases like heart disease and diabetes, which are readily amenable to lifestyle changes. Knowing ones risk for these conditions is the first step toward prevention. Navigenics (www.navigenics.com ) offers over 20 conditions to focus oneâ€™s efforts depending on risk. It also provides information on improving oneâ€™s health (http://blog.navigenics.com/).
So the comment, â€œpersonal genomics companies rely on people having disposable income to spend on non-necessitiesâ€ is a bit misleading. I would hardly call prevention a â€œnon-necessityâ€.  Let the numbers speak to â€œnecessityâ€. The cost of genetic screening among the three top companies ranges from $400 to $2500 depending on the level of service. The cost of treating colon cancer diagnosed early is $30,000 per episode. Cost at a later stage, $120,000 per episode. National cost for treatment of new colon cancer cases in 2007, $2.4 billion. (www.eifoundation.org/national/nccra/report_card/docs/CRC_Cost_Fact_Sheet.doc -).
I am not so sure that risk assessment by genome scanning is a â€œnon-necessityâ€.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In response to the posting: deCODE Genetics Sinking Low , I have the following comments. Almost everyone now realizes that the way to limit medical costs is to increase preventive measures. Of the over two trillion dollars a year we spend on health care, about 75% goes toward chronic diseases like heart disease and diabetes, which are readily amenable to lifestyle changes. Knowing ones risk for these conditions is the first step toward prevention. Navigenics (www.navigenics.com ) offers over 20 conditions to focus oneâ€™s efforts depending on risk. It also provides information on improving oneâ€™s health (<a href="http://blog.navigenics.com/)" rel="nofollow">http://blog.navigenics.com/)</a>.<br />
So the comment, â€œpersonal genomics companies rely on people having disposable income to spend on non-necessitiesâ€ is a bit misleading. I would hardly call prevention a â€œnon-necessityâ€.  Let the numbers speak to â€œnecessityâ€. The cost of genetic screening among the three top companies ranges from $400 to $2500 depending on the level of service. The cost of treating colon cancer diagnosed early is $30,000 per episode. Cost at a later stage, $120,000 per episode. National cost for treatment of new colon cancer cases in 2007, $2.4 billion. (www.eifoundation.org/national/nccra/report_card/docs/CRC_Cost_Fact_Sheet.doc -).<br />
I am not so sure that risk assessment by genome scanning is a â€œnon-necessityâ€.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
